I have now had my
first encounter with the Illinois learning standards.
When I watch a
movie, if it begins with a cliché, I can almost guarantee that I
need not continue watching. The movie will inevitably be bad. For
example, a horror movie that begins with a car that refuses to start
is a dead giveaway that I am not watching a Hitchcock-level film.
The Illinois state history standards begin with this:
George Santayana said
"those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
This is the ultimate history education cliché. It's very language
implies that the past was all bad.
As
I read this cliché, I knew I was not going to like the standards. I
was correct. Whereas Common Core do not attempt to standardize
content, the state standards haphazardly attempt to do so, which is
worse than completely ignoring content. The state standards include
some skill-based, Common Core-like standards. Many are semi-broad
content-based, like “Analyze the relationship of an issue in world
political history to the related aspects of world economic, social
and environmental history.” These I take no issue with. However,
the more specific standards are so few that they should not be
included. “Analyze the impact of westward expansion on the United
States economy.” This is a very good standard, but there are only
8 or 10 such specific standards for high school. Many
highly-important events are nowhere to be found. Karl Marx is
mentioned, but not a single US President. These specific standards
need to be significantly expanded or dropped.
Whoever
wrote these standards has an obsession with environmental history.
Of the 33 content-based high school history standards, 14 involve
environmental history. 42%!!! Our students may not know what
Watergate is or be able to name any President besides Washington and
Lincoln, but they'll be experts on how the Suez Canal affected the
environment. Ridiculous only begins to describe. It is no wonder
that they are not used very frequently. There are some I can use for
my scope & sequence that are very applicable. However, there
will entire units where only one state standard applies. I really
hope no schools are tailoring their curriculum to the state
standards.
That's very interesting. I had no idea environment is such a significant part of the standarads. It does suggest a political bias. Perhaps there's some negotiation to conduct
ReplyDelete