These research
presentations have been enlightening. Each of us has chosen a
different topic, done all the digging, and presenting the important
information on different issues to the rest of the class. I have
learned much. We have looked at PARCC several times throughout this
class, enough that I can formulate a solid opinion on it. Whenever I
learn that Pearson is behind something, the conspiracy theorist in me
automatically takes over. I despise the massive trends of corporate
conglomeration. Pearson has become the education conglomerate, and
reliance on one for-profit company for so much of our educational
resources is very disturbing.
However, in an
attempt to suppress my inner conspiracy theorist, the PARCC test
itself is a step in the right direction. I am a huge proponent of
critical thinking, and testing those skills is difficult, but
important (if standardized testing is to be done, that is). PARCC
does test high-level thinking. As we have learned, it is very
flawed. The technological bells and whistles are no substitute for
clear directions. It may be too difficult. I looked at it a bit
more after class, and struggled with some parts, and I fancy myself
fairly skilled in English/language arts. It may be asking too much
for high school students to ever score well on these tests. It is
certainly asking too much for them to score well any time in the next
few years. This high-level thinking requires scaffolding, and the
tests should be scaffolded as well, perhaps with gradually increasing
difficulty over the next five years or so.
Calan's
presentation also greatly intrigued me. IB schools, with oversight,
could be a very important and successful way of educating in our
increasingly globalized world. I would love to teach at one. I am
not sure if I would want to spend five years in Saudi Arabia, but if
I did not have kids I would consider it. The idea that students in
different countries receive the same quality education, preparing
them for universities worldwide, is ambitious, but I think very
important in the future. If IB schools are simply a networking
opportunity, however, then our priorities are greatly misplaced
(which is often the case).
I share your unease with educational conglomerates. The tail begins to wag the dog. Privatization, I believe, is a terrible mistake. I also share your views about the PARCC. When discussion began about testing the Common Core, I hoped there would be a performance task. I still like the idea of a performance task, but these tasks are too difficult for students.
ReplyDelete